Three Australian researchers whose work has had a significant impact on healthcare policy and delivery have been honoured in the Sax Institute’s 2018 Research Action Awards.
This year’s award winners have made a tangible difference in areas as diverse as the prevention and care of childhood injuries; improving health services for the homeless; and avoiding unnecessary and potentially harmful surgery in stroke prevention.
Congratulating the winners, Sax Institute Deputy CEO Dr Martin McNamara said their exemplary work demonstrated how research can help transform our health systems and policies and improve health and wellbeing.
“Our award winners have relentlessly pursued research that is of critical importance to healthcare, not just in Australia but across the world. A common thread across all three winners is that they have not been content to simply publish their research, but have become powerful advocates for better healthcare in their particular areas, actively engaging policy makers at all levels,” Dr McNamara said.
“In one case, alarmed that new policy was about to be created that flew in the face of her findings, one of our award winners went so far as to write to then U.S. President Barack Obama – a contact that helped trigger an invitation to address US policy makers, and produce meaningful policy change.”
The winners were presented with their Awards by Professor Anne Kelso AO, CEO of the National Health and Medical Research Council, at a ceremony in Sydney on the evening of Wednesday, 28 November. The Secretary of NSW Health, Elizabeth Koff, was also a guest speaker at the event, which was attended by around 150 senior policy makers, research leaders, academics and others.
Nick Mays, Professor of Health Policy at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and chairman of the independent assessment committee that chose the winners, said this year’s field of applicants was “among the strongest yet” and reflected the vitality of Australia’s research culture.
Professor Mays said many of the applicants had demonstrated “great personal commitment and persistence” in conducting their research and advocating for its uptake into policy.
The Sax Institute established the annual Research Action Awards in 2015 to recognise researchers whose work has made a significant impact on health policy, programs or service delivery. Each winner receives a certificate and a prize of $5,000.
About the Sax Institute
The Sax Institute is an independent Australian leader in helping decision makers find and make best use of research to solve real-world health and social problems. It is a non-profit, public good organisation with a membership base of over 50 public health and health services research groups and their universities. The 2018 Research Action Awards were open to Sax Institute member organisations who conduct public health or health services research.
The Sax Institute thanks the NSW Ministry of Health and the Commonwealth Bank of Australia for their generous support of the 2018 Research Action Awards.
Find out more
Media contact: Hugo Wilcken M: 0451 122 146
The 2018 Research Action Award Winners:
Associate Professor Anne Abbott, Monash University – stroke prevention in carotid stenosis
Up until very recently, people with advanced carotid stenosis (narrowing of the main arteries supplying blood to the brain) and without related stroke symptoms were routinely recommended procedural treatment. This typically involves either surgery designed to clear the blockage, or stenting, which involves inserting a device to prop open the artery and keep the blood circulating. However, like all invasive procedures, both these interventions come with a significant risk of harm. Associate Professor Abbott’s key discovery was that medical intervention (appropriate medication and lifestyle changes) alone can reduce the risk of stroke in these people by at least 65%, compared with previous practice.
Associate Professor Abbott’s research and advocacy have had a powerful effect on both prevention practice and policy. It is now recognised by many that medical intervention alone is the best option for advanced asymptomatic carotid stenosis, and trials now incorporate medical intervention as well as procedural arms. Associate Professor Abbott’s efforts to alert the medical community to the significance of her findings led to her being invited to address US experts conducting a review of US Medicare’s reimbursement policy for treatment of carotid artery disease. Her work was instrumental in their decision not to fund widespread stenting, helping to reduce harmful and wasteful procedures in many thousands of people each year.
“The message I’d like the public to take home from my research is that they have the most power to prevent their own stroke by adopting healthy lifestyle habits and using medication appropriately for things like high blood pressure and cholesterol. Combining all these things is very effective in stroke prevention,” said Associate Professor Abbott.
Professor Kate Curtis, University of Sydney – prevention and care of critical childhood injury
Although major trauma from falls, road accidents or violence is the leading cause of death and disability in Australian children, injury rates have not changed in the past decade and there has been surprisingly little research into the incidence of childhood injury in Australia, causes of injury, or the most effective treatments. Professor Curtis heads up a major program of research that aims to fill the gaps in paediatric trauma knowledge and reduce the incidence and impact of childhood injury.
Her research has for the first time described the incidence and causes of paediatric injury in Australia, using data from over half a million hospitalisation and mortality records. Professor Curtis and her team have also assessed processes of care and associated outcomes for 535 severely injured children in NSW, as well as conducting a two-year study to determine what aspects of care patients feel could improve their experience and wellbeing. This research is already having a significant impact on national prevention policy.
“We’ve been able to bring our research into rates of childhood injury to the attention of the federal government through meetings with child commissioners and health ministers,” said Professor Curtis.
“Just this month Health Minister Greg Hunt signed off on a national injury prevention plan. Until then, we didn’t have one, which just seems crazy, given that it’s such a huge cause of death and disability.”
Associate Professor Lisa Wood, University of Western Australia – improving the health of homeless people
There is a revolving door between homelessness and health, with high rates of emergency department presentations and hospitalisations making this not just a moral but a fiscal issue as well. But homelessness charities and agencies on the ground rarely have the time or resources to do the research and build the real-world evidence needed to make headway.
Having started out working pro bono in this area, Associate Professor Lisa Wood now leads a rapidly growing program of research and collaboration with homelessness organisations across WA and Victoria. Her team has developed the largest database of linked homelessness and health data in Australia. This innovative project has involved linking hospital records for 3400 homeless patients to other homeless, housing and police data to glean new insights into predictors of homelessness, the effectiveness of interventions and the barriers to delivering policies and services that work.
One of the focuses of Associate Professor Wood’s research program has been the use of evidence to advocate for services. A recent example was a street health service that was providing healthcare to rough sleepers, which was about to close due to lack of funding.
“We quickly generated some case studies and a report that showed the benefits of that service,” said Associate Professor Wood. “It got some media coverage which led to a philanthropist coming forward and offering $100,000 to continue that service. She’s just put in another $100,000, and one of her comments was how much she valued the evaluation that we undertook of that service.”