March 2013. Steel A, Frawley J, Dobson A, Jackson C, Lucke J, Tooth L, Brown W, Byles J, Mishra G. This Evidence Check review examined the evidence on key health issues affecting NSW women across the life course and the social determinants that impact on their risk of developing...READ MORE
A Sax Institute Evidence Check involves conducting a rapid review of existing research and evidence that is tailored to a policy agency’s individual needs. Our Knowledge Exchange team then coordinates an Evidence Check Review – a concise summary of evidence that answers specific policy questions presented in a policy-friendly format.
The Evidence Check Library houses a selection of Evidence Check Reviews conducted for policy agencies over the past two years.
To commission a review call + 61 2 9188 9500 or email the Knowledge Exchange team.
January 2013. Gill T, Hector D, Rissel C, Trieu K, Zhong A, O’Hara B, Bauman A. This Evidence Check review investigated feasible, whole of government interventions to prevent overweight and obesity at the population level. The report makes recommendations about increasing levels of physical activity, decreasing consumption of energy...READ MORE
December 2012. Phillipson L, Larsen-Truong K, Jones S, Pitts L. This Evidence Check review examined the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of Chinese, Vietnamese and Arabic speaking communities in Australia in relation to cancer, its causes, screening, treatments, perceptions of susceptibility, and perceived outcomes. The review explores fear, stigma, taboos,...READ MORE
December 2012. Emery J, Trevena L, Mazza D, Fallon-Ferguson J, Shaw K, Williams B, Varlow M. This Evidence Check review considers the role of primary care in early detection, including screening and follow-up care of patients with breast, colorectal, prostate and lung cancer. Best practice models include partnerships between...READ MORE
December 2012. Davidson P, Luckett T, Newton P, Agar M, Daly L, Sibbritt D. This Evidence Check review investigated best practice in early assessment and diagnosis of lung cancer. Increasing awareness of risk factors and of the importance of early assessment and diagnosis among health professionals and the community is...READ MORE
November 2012. Jiwa M, McManus A, Dadich A, Hewitt V. This Evidence Check review found that primary care is well positioned to support individuals diagnosed with cancer. Evidence-based guidelines are required to help identify patients presenting with ‘red flag’ symptoms. Research on innovations to implement guidelines, such as decision...READ MORE
October 2012. Gordon R, Magee C, Jones S, Phillipson L, Barrie L. Early diagnosis of lung cancer may be important in improving the survival rate and patients’ quality of life. This Evidence Check review assessed the effectiveness of ‘signs and symptoms’ campaigns in influencing knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and help-seeking...READ MORE
October 2012. Mooney G, Angell B, Pares J. This Evidence Check review considers the main approaches to priority setting to support resource allocation. While knowledge about their impact on efficiency and equity is limited, the report identifies ‘opportunity cost’ and ‘the margin’ as key criteria and proposes Program Budgeting...READ MORE
August 2012. Rickwood D, Thomas K, Bradford S. There is no agreed definition of help-seeking behaviour in the context of mental health and wellbeing in Australia. Based on this Evidence Check review, a standardised definition is proposed: “In the mental health context, help seeking is an adaptive coping process...READ MORE
June 2012. DiGiacomo M, Davidson P, McGrath S, Dharmendra T, Thompson S. This Evidence Check review examined the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians about cancer and their susceptibility to cancer. The review also analysed available evidence about the effectiveness of programs and interventions...READ MORE